Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
                
News - Local / Metro

Thursday, Oct. 29, 2009

Auditor thinks attorney general's stance could be challenged

Opinion supports Richland 2 in tax controversy

- dhinshaw@thestate.com
Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print Reprint 0 comments
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

The attorney general's office has settled the tax dispute brewing since summer between the Richland County auditor and District 2 schools.

For now.

An opinion issued Wednesday said County Council - not the auditor - is responsible for setting the tax rate and determining the maximum amount schools may receive under a state law limiting tax increases.

Today's news video

But Auditor Paul Brawley said that may not be the end of it.

"I'm sure somebody will probably challenge it," the auditor said.

Asked whether that meant he was encouraging someone to sue, Brawley responded, "I can't encourage citizens one way or the other."

At issue are the calculations that go into figuring the tax rate to produce the school district's $120 million budget - without exceeding the limits set by state law.

District 2's finance officers said the schools would be $3 million short this year if the county adopted Brawley's figures.

Richland County Council went with their figures, raising the school taxes paid by businesses and the owners of vehicles.

The first of the tax bills should start arriving in today's mail.

Mike Montgomery, a former councilman who was the school district's advocate on the issue, said he's confident the calculations won't exceed the state "cap" on increases.

Brawley disagreed.

"Anyone that's familiar with the taxation process in this state understands that the auditors are put into the equation to make sure there are checks and balances for the citizens of the county," he said.

"If the County Council calculates the millage (or tax) cap, that's the proverbial fox guarding the henhouse."

There's no uniform way to calculate tax rates - a problem compounded by recent changes in state law to "cap" tax increases and the need to refigure property values every five years.

This is the first year those two issues have arisen at the same time in South Carolina.

Reach Hinshaw at (803) 771-8641.

Get The State newspaper delivered to your home. Click here to subscribe.

Your comments

We encourage an open – and civil – exchange of affirming and dissenting opinions on our stories. We invite you to respectfully comment on our content as part of our interactive community.

The news you want delivered to your e-mail!

Quick Job Search