State Rep. Nikki Haley of Lexington fell just short of winning outright Tuesday’s Republican primary for governor.
Haley, a Tea Party darling, garnered nearly half of all GOP votes. U.S. Rep. Gresham Barrett from Westminster claimed second in the four-way GOP contest but trailed Haley badly.
The two, who previously have tussled in televised debates over who is the true conservative, will face off in a June 22 runoff unless Barrett concedes the race before then.
The eventual GOP winner then must begin the long march to November’s general election against the Democratic nominee for governor, state Sen. Vincent Sheheen of Camden, who glided easily to victory in his party’s Tuesday primary.
“We knew from the beginning it was us vs. the establishment,” Haley said Tuesday night, addressing a room of supporters in Columbia. “We were settling (in South Carolina) for a Republican House, a Republican Senate, a Republican governor. I won’t stop until we get a conservative House, a conservative Senate, a conservative governor.”
Barrett, in a speech to his supporters in downtown Greenville, said he is prepped for the runoff battle.
“We’re in the runoff, and I’m excited about that,” Barrett said. “Now, we’ve got two weeks. … We’re going to finish strong, and we’re going to make history.”
The two are fighting to succeed outgoing Gov. Mark Sanford, a two-term Republican, and secure the $100,078-a-year job.
Garnering only a fraction of the vote, two longtime GOP politicians — state Attorney General Henry McMaster and Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer — conceded they were out of the race. Neither issued an endorsement Tuesday.
Haley, a six-year member of the S.C. House who has won endorsements from former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and former S.C. first lady Jenny Sanford, has run an anti-establishment campaign, calling for more on-the-record votes in the Legislature, term limits for lawmakers and increased auditing of state agencies. In the Legislature, her bills to translate her ideas into law have faltered, the majority never making it beyond the House committee level.
With little money, many political observers had written Haley’s candidacy off. Others speculated her ties to Sanford, caught in a sex scandal, would doom her campaign. But twin endorsements from Palin and Jenny Sanford catapulted Haley from back-of-the-pack status to front-runner.
Barrett, who spent six years in the S.C. House and the last eight years in Congress, has run a pro-business campaign, centered on ending the economic downturn in South Carolina’s by attracting new industry and helping existing ones, retraining the state’s workers for high-tech jobs and overhauling the state’s tax code.
In the campaign’s last weeks, Barrett siphoned off some McMaster and Bauer voters while retaining his base of Upstate support, social conservatives and members of the state’s business community. But he has clashed with members of the Tea Party for his 2008 vote for the federal financial bailout.
Haley repeatedly has referenced Barrett’s bailout vote during debates as proof Barrett is not a true conservative. Barrett has fired back that Haley cast a vote last year in favor of South Carolina accepting federal stimulus money to offset state budget cuts.
But the biggest accusations of the campaign season — that Haley has been unfaithful to her husband twice — have not stuck. During the past two weeks, two men have claimed to have had inappropriate sexual relations with Haley. She categorically denied the allegations.
We encourage an open – and civil – exchange of affirming and dissenting opinions on our stories. We invite you to respectfully comment on our content as part of our interactive community.
Click here to read our comment guidelines and learn about our commenting system. Report abuse by clicking the "Report Abuse" link.
You must be signed in to comment. You can sign in using your account at thestate.com or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus accounts.
If you are logged in and still unable to comment, you might need to log out and log back in, delete your browser's stored cookies or change your browser's cookie settings to allow "third-party" cookies.
For more on managing browser cookies, view our help document here.
How do I report abuse on comments I deem inappropriate?
Yes. Report abuse by clicking the "Flag" button.
What are some of the features of Disqus commenting?
You can select how comment threads are organized. Some people prefer to read the newest comments first, while others prefer to read the oldest comments first. Others prefer to sort on comments that have the best rating (highest number of "likes") or are the most popular now (highest number of "likes" and replies). The choice will be yours. You can lock in your personal preference by selecting from among the options presented in the "Sort by" drop down menu that appears above the comments you are reading. This setting follows you across the site as your read articles and can be changed at your convenience.
You will have the option of subscribing via email to a comment thread by clicking the "Subscribe by email" button at the bottom of the comment box. New comments will be sent directly to your email inbox, where you may read and respond by email.
You will be able to subscribe via RSS to a comment thread by clicking the "Subscribe by RSS" button at the bottom of the comment box. This link will include step-by-step instructions on how to set up the RSS subscription.
If you are logged in using your Facebook account, you will be able to share your comments on specific articles to your Facebook profile page, just by clicking the "Share on Facebook" link directly beneath the comment box. This is a per-post selection, so each time you comment on an article or reply to another comment, you will need to indicate your interest in sharing the post to Facebook.
Will I need to register?
You can register with thestate.com to comment, or log in with an existing Disqus, Facebook or Twitter account. If you have forgotten your thestate.com username and password, you can have the information resent to you by clicking here.
What about my avatar?
We have created a default avatar for readers that log in using their thestate.com username and password. If you want to display a unique avatar, you can upload one to Disqus, Facebook or Twitter, and then comment on thestate.com stories using that account instead.
Will I be able to indicate my approval of a comment?
Yes, by clicking the button labeled "Like."
Will I be able to "reply" to comments?
Yes. The ability to reply to specific comment posts will remain a core of thestate.com commenting.
We ask that you remain civil, and that you follow these guidelines:
Do not resort to personal abuse. You may disagree with the content of an article, with the reporter or with other readers’ comments, but do not attack anyone personally. Do not libel or defame anyone or violate their privacy.
Keep your comments succinct and stay on topic. Comments that bear no relation to the story will be deleted.
Do not use foul language. Don't try to camouflage profanity with asterisks or other symbols or foreign phrases.
Avoid hate speech. Abusive comments, racist rants or defamatory statements about any group will be deleted.
Do not use threatening language. Repeated bullying or taunting will be cause for banning your account.
Use standard English grammar and observe accepted rules for capitalization, punctuation and spelling. Do not post a comment using all capital letters.
Do not post spam or advertising of any kind.
Do not add images to your comments.
Do not link to Web sites outside of thestate.com.
Do not use an avatar that is offensive or portrays someone in a negative light. Do not misspell or emphasize letters in a person's name to ridicule them or portray them in a negative manner.
Do not report comments as abusive simply because you disagree with them. Report them only if they violate these guidelines.
We reserve the right to delete posts that do not follow these guidelines. Posts that violate these guidelines or are otherwise offensive should be reported immediately. Click the "flag" link under the offending comment.
If a post is determined to have violated the guidelines listed above, it may be (1) blocked or (2) deleted from our system.
Users who continue posting comments that violate these guidelines may, at our discretion, be blocked from submitting future comments as well.