SUMMERVILLE - An ordinance to require apartment managers and employers
to
verify the immigration status of renters and workers got initial council
approval Wednesday, despite pleas from landlords and threats of
lawsuits.
If the ordinance gets final approval next month, it would be one of the
most
restrictive in the nation.
There was little controversy over making employers check immigration
status,
since both the state and Dorchester County have recently passed similar
laws. But there was a lot of argument over making property managers
demand
more proof of residency from renters.
S.C. Apartment Association President Victoria Cowart warned council the
ordinance would cost the town money, as renters avoided Summerville
because
of the hassle. The town has 7,200 rental units, she said.
"This will hamper our business," she said. "People will turn around and
go
(somewhere else)."
Charleston Apartment Association President Marysa Raymond warned that
the
ordinance conflicts with federal fair housing laws.
S.C. American Civil Liberties Union Director Victoria Middleton warned
that
the ordinance would spark a lawsuit in Summerville, as it has in other
cities where it was tried.
"We have doubts about the constitutionality of this measure," she said.
Town Attorney Mark Stokes recently advised council not to pass the
ordinance
because of the probability of lawsuits. Councilmen Aaron Brown and Mike
Dawson, who voted against the ordinance Wednesday, repeated that
warning.
"We've all heard that it's a fool that doesn't take the advice of his
attorney," Brown said before the vote.
"There is a tremendous liability involved here. It's going to cost you
as
taxpayers to defend these lawsuits."
"A lawsuit is not just a possibility; it's a certainty," Dawson said.
Councilman Walter Bailey, who proposed the ordinance, brushed off
concerns
over lawsuits.
"All I'm asking is that people who come to this country stand in line
like
everybody else ... and become legal," Bailey said. "I'm offended by the
intimidation by the ACLU and other groups. If they want to challenge us
to a
lawsuit, I'll accept that challenge. ... We need to stand up and do
what's
right."
Mayor Berlin Myers allowed the audience more than hour to express their
concerns before the vote. Many residents urged council to move ahead
with
the ordinance.
"This is about being here with the right papers," Dennis Driggers told
council. "Stand up. Don't be scared."
"This country has got to get back to having some backbone and cracking
the
whip," Timothy Granger said. "I think we need to get back to getting
some
rules and regulations. ... It's not about profiling, it's about being
legal."
Reba Campbell, deputy executive Director of the S.C. Municipal
Association,
said before the meeting that she didn't know of any other municipality
in
South Carolina considering a similar ordinance.
Bailey recently said he based on the ordinance on a similar move in
Fremont,
Neb. Fremont's law was supposed to go into effect the last of July, but
the
city suspended it pending the outcome of lawsuits by the ACLU of
Nebraska
and the Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund.
Judges also struck down similar measures in Hazleton, Pa., and Farmers
Branch, Texas.
An Arizona immigration law went into effect last month. But a provision
that
requires police to check the immigration status of everyone they stop is
on
hold after a judge said it was unconstitutional.
The South Carolina Illegal Immigration Reform Act was passed in 2008.
The
act increases requirements on employers to verify the work eligibility
status of newly hired workers and denies many public benefits for
illegal
immigrants.
States, counties and municipalities are filling the void because the
last
immigration reform efforts in Congress in 2005 fell flat.
About 1,000 immigrations bills have been brought up in state
legislatures so
far this year, CCN reported in April, citing the National Conference of
State Legislatures.
Reach Dave Munday at 937-5553 or dmunday@postandcourier.com.