RICHLAND COUNTY ELECTION MESS

Richland vote count: Finlay, Dixon, Penny Tax winners in count

jmonk@thestate.com, dprice@thestate.comNovember 15, 2012 

  • S.C. CERTIFIES MOST OF ITS ELECTION RESULTS The State Election Commission has certified many of the results from this month’s elections in South Carolina. Commissioners voted Wednesday to officially recognize all races in the state that did not involve Richland County. The decision to leave out Richland County means results in the presidential race, the state constitutional amendment, two U.S. House races, five state Senate races and 12 state House races are not official yet. Richland County was still counting its votes Wednesday after a court challenge. The county has been ordered to certify its results before noon Friday, and the State Election Commission plans to consider the results Friday afternoon. The Associated Press WHAT’S NEXT IN RICHLAND COUNTY • The Richland County Election Commission will meet at 8 a.m. Friday to address provisional and challenged ballots. It has until noon Friday to deliver the results to the State Election Commission. • The state commission will certify the results by 5 p.m. Friday. • Any protests must be filed with the appropriate election commission by noon Wednesday, Nov. 21. • It is still unknown whether the legislative delegation, which hired county elections director Lillian McBride, will require her to explain to the public why the Nov. 6 election was such a disaster. Delegation chairman Sen. Darrell Jackson, D-Richland, has said he doesn’t want to fire McBride and wants to give her a chance to run the next election. Results in contested races PENNY SALES TAX QUESTION 1: Raising the tax Yes: 80,223 No: 73,648 QUESTION 2: Borrowing the money Yes: 77,236 No: 71,631 S.C. HOUSE RACES House 75: Kirkman Finlay, R House 76: Leon Howard, D (i) House 78: Beth Bernstein, D S.C. SENATE RACES District 20 (RichCo only; portion in LexCo): John Courson, R (i) RICHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL District 2: Joyce Dickerson, D (i) District 7: Torrey Rush, D District 8: Jim Manning, D (i) District 9: Julie Ann Dixon, D District 10: Kelvin Washington, D (i) RICHLAND 1 BOARD At-large: Vince Ford (i), Barbara Scott District 2: Jamie Devine (i) RICHLAND 2 BOARD At-large: Susan Brill (i), Calvin “Chip” Jackson (i), Monica Elkins LEXINGTON-RICHLAND 5 Robert Gantt (i) Statewide referendum: Lieutenant governor election Yes: 93,046 No: 57,949

— In a count delayed a week, Kirkman Finlay appeared to prevail over Joe McCulloch, 7,207 to 6,891 in House District 75, in one of tightest and most closely watched races in Richland County’s botched Nov. 6 election, according to preliminary results from Wednesday’s tally.

Finlay, a Republican, had 6,771 votes, and McCulloch, a Democrat, had 6,506 in the original count.

Totals came just after 11 p.m. Wednesday – eight days after the election marked by huge outcries from voters and candidates alike and a tumultuous legal back-and-forth that led courts to interrupt Richland County’s vote before the count was complete last week.

Results showed the penny sales tax issue passed, with 80,223 voting in favor and 73,648 voting against, a 6,575-vote difference – a 52 percent to 47 percent win. Last week’s initial results in the penny sales tax issue showed a spread of about 9,300 votes.

But the results produced an upset in another tight race – County Council member Val Hutchinson, a Republican, lost to Democrat newcomer Julie Ann Dixon. Dixon had 7,540 votes; Hutchinson, 7,317.

Initial results in that race had Hutchison with 7,105 votes, Dixon with 6,923, although Dixon led in early returns Nov. 6 and Hutchinson was led initially to believe she had lost.

The Richland County Election & Voter Registration office announced the results at the Richland County administration building at about 11:15 p.m. The commission had supervised a tedious count of all 154,000-plus ballots – electronic and paper – that took almost six hours and involved more than a dozen people.

Wednesday’s results are unofficial and will be certified at 8 a.m. Friday in County Council chambers at the administration building on Harden Street. The commission will review provisional and challenged ballots, then certify the results.

The S.C. Supreme Court, which took an appeal from a lower court, told county elections officials they had until noon Friday to deliver the results to the State Election Commission.

The Nov. 6 vote for the presidential race, State House, County Council and board of education races should have been tallied a week ago.

But because of reasons still not fully explained, the Nov. 6 county elections procedures were thrown into disorder in numerous ways, including the fact that numerous paper ballots had somehow managed to be printed in a smaller-type format that could not be read by the voting scanning machines the county uses to tally votes.

Earlier Wednesday, officials went through some 15,000 paper absentee ballots, searching for the defective ballots with the smaller type size. Once those defective ballots were located, officials took them out and then slowly transferred by hand the choices marked on the defective paper ballots to ballots with the properly sized type.

Then the new paper ballots – apparently several hundred – were run through a scanning machines.

Totals from that batch of paper ballots were added to those from more than 14,000 other paper ballots counted earlier Wednesday. Those totals were then added to a computerized tally from some 700 voting machines.

Wednesday’s count – the first complete count of the Nov. 6 ballots – was overseen by Richland County Election Commission chairwoman Liz Crum, who with the commission’s four other members helped tally votes. Also on hand were a half-dozen staffers from the Richland County Elections & Voter Registration office, as well as voting machine technicians.

The office’s executive director, Lillian McBride – the $86,344 department head who was in charge of orchestrating last week’s election – did not take part in Wednesday’s count.

Since last week, McBride has refused to explain what led to one of the most bungled elections in modern state history. Many of the county’s 124 precincts lacked sufficient numbers of voting machines and many machines broke down, resulting in waits for three to seven hours for thousands of voters across the county. Hundreds – perhaps thousands – of people dropped out of the lines and never got to vote.

By law, the county was supposed to have one machine per 250 voters. Earlier this year, McBride had assured County Council members the $1.2 million that council had given her office for this year’s budget would result in a smooth election.

Asked why McBride was not in the counting room with commission members and her staffers, Crum said that “her presence would have been a distraction” because reporters at the count would have been asking her questions about the Nov. 6 race.

“Nobody asked her to come, but we did not ask her not to come, either,” Crum said. Crum said the last time she saw McBride was around 6 p.m. in her office elsewhere in the building.

Crum said at some point McBride will give a full explanation of what went wrong on election day.

“Our goal now is to get an accurate count, get the vote certified, and then there will be explanations – there will be a written report, and there will be explanations.”

Because of next week’s Thanksgiving holiday, answers won’t be available until the week after, Crum said.

Representatives from Republican and Democratic parties as well as a half-dozen reporters watched Wednesday’s count.

It took elections officials four hours Wednesday, from 1 p.m. to shortly after 5 p.m., to get all the electronic and paper data ready to begin the counting.

Questions remain about the different numerical totals between Wednesday night and last week. But due to the lateness of the hour when results were announced Wednesday, explanations will have to wait.

The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service

Top Jobs

View All

Find a Home

$250,000 Columbia
. Great Commercial opportunity Large Warehouse/Office Space...

Find a Car

Search New Cars