Richland County taking on less-traveled dirt roads + video

dhinshaw@thestate.com July 29, 2013 

Arturo Rodriguez has lived on Wilson Farm Road for 17 years. Heavy rains constantly wash out the road. "It would be nice if we could get it paved" He said. "She (His fiance's daughter) has scooters and bikes, it would be nice if she could ride them."

TRACY GLANTZ — tglantz@thestate.com Buy Photo

  • Alternative dirt-road paving

    Richland County has selected the first 10 roads to be paved using alternative methods that pare down costs, allowing roads that are off the beaten path to be paved. The roads, totaling 8.25 miles, to be paved under the new program are:

    0.13-mile of Breazio Road

    0.14-mile of Clayton Street

    0.25-mile of Dorichlee Lane

    0.07-mile of Eastover Street

    0.05-mile of Kirk Road

    0.17-mile of Larkin Court

    0.07-mile of Lavender Street

    0.15-mile of Pierce Road

    0.22-mile of Summer Wind Drive

    0.19-mile of Wilson Farm Road

    SOURCE: Richland County

— By October, contractors should be paving the first of potentially hundreds of short stretches of dirt roads in Richland County using alternative methods that would allow more roads to be paved more cheaply.

County officials are starting with $4.2 million to pave 45 roads – most of them dead-end roads less than a half-mile long.

Altogether, the county plans to pave 8.25 miles at $500,000 a mile.

At least 10 roads will be paved this fall, county engineer Ismail Ozbek said. The planned projects are scattered across unincorporated Richland County.

All property owners along each of the affected lanes must agree to provide the land, or right-of-way, to ensure roads are at least 18 feet wide and to add drainage ditches on each side.

Relaxing standards for the roads used by a limited number of people, as some other S.C. county governments have done, gives Richland County a new way to address an estimated 153 miles of the county’s 225 miles of dirt roads.

Since 2009, council members Norman Jackson and Kelvin Washington have pushed for new dirt-road standards to address roads used by few people – roads that, otherwise, would not be considered for paving anytime soon. For years, the county has scraped them and put down gravel to keep them passable for residents, ambulances, mail carriers, school buses and firetrucks.

“It would be nice to have a paved road,” said Arturo Rodriguez, 41, who owns one of the seven homes along Wilson Farm Road in Lower Richland.

Rodriguez said his children can’t ride their bikes or scooters in the road, and some friends won’t come visit because they’re afraid they’ll damage their cars.

“At least it will cut the cost down in terms of realignment,” he said. “I’m pretty meticulous on my vehicles. I’ve got a Harley Davidson, try to keep it clean.”

The new standards allow more narrow lanes covered with alternative materials that result in thinner surfaces. The lifespan of the road isn’t as long, about 10 years compared to 15 years for a traditional road surface, county officials have said.

Both Jackson and Washington have experience in roads and transportation. Each represents parts of Lower Richland, and both sit on a special County Council dirt-road committee recently formed to get the project going.

“Now we’re finally moving forward,” Jackson said last week.

“This constant rain we’ve been having, I’ve had so many calls about roads that people can’t drive on.”

The 45 roads will be paved using $3.3 million in state gas-tax money, representing about three years’ worth of Richland County’s funding. The remainder, $900,000, came from the county’s drainage and maintenance fund.

Last week, members of the dirt-road committee told county officials to go ahead and negotiate a contract with a consultant who will meet with residents to explain details of the program.

The consultant, Clarence Hill of J.B. Ladner and Associates, will be responsible for convincing residents to provide rights-of-way for all the county’s dirt-road paving projects, including those to be paved under the new transportation sales tax.

The county has not yet begun to receive money from the local sales tax, approved by voters in November and collected since May.

The county’s public works department, working with a team led by Civil Engineering Consulting Services, selected the 45 roads to be included in the alternative dirt-road paving program. The order reflects how many people live along a road as well as whether there’s a church or business.

They also are spread around the county by council district, though none are within the city limits. The largest number of the dirt roads eligible for the alternative dirt-road paving are in Lower Richland County, Hammett said.

To be eligible, they must not connect with a main road and they must carry 400 or fewer cars each day. That means they are used by local residents only.

For the first 10 projects, Ozbek said he selected roads that had no environmental issues, those that are “shovel ready and quick, so that we can show some progress.”

The initiative has been in the works even before voters approved a penny-on-the-dollar sales tax for transportation improvements in November.

If every road eligible for alternative road-paving were to use the cheaper standards, that would leave 72 miles to pave with conventional methods and standards. County Council set aside $45 million for dirt-road paving in the penny sales-tax plan – still short of the money required to pave all of them.

Hammett said alternative paving costs an estimated $500,000 a mile compared with $700,000 a mile for conventional paving.

It’s hard to know how common such programs might be. The S.C. Association of Counties did not have any data on such programs. Neither did the S.C. Department of Transportation. Efforts to reach national and local trade groups for general contractors and road builders were unsuccessful.

But one of the county’s consultants, Andy Tolleson, president of Tolleson Engineering and Planning Consultants, said alternative road-paving programs have become more accepted.

“It really is not unconventional,” he added. “The standards have probably been in place for 30 years.”

Tolleson said special standards for low-volume roads allow counties to pave for less, cut maintenance costs, maintain the character of rural areas and ensure emergency vehicles can use the road.

Reach Hinshaw at (803) 771-8641.

The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service