What does it really mean when market sets record?

The New York TimesNovember 22, 2013 

77495263

People stand near the broker's booth for 500.com Limited (NYSE: WBAI) as it's IPO is set on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on November 22, 2013 in New York City. 500.com Limited, an online sports lottery service provider in China, opened for trading at $20 after pricing 5,786,000 ADSs. In early trading the Dow Jones Industrial Average was little changed after closing above 16,000 for the first time ever on Thursday. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

SPENCER PLATT — Getty Images

The stock market flirted with historical highs this week, with the Dow Jones industrial average trading higher than 16,000 and the Standard & Poor’s 500 exceeding 1,800 for a time.

But are stock prices really at record levels? Adjusted for inflation, the answer would seem to be they are not.

On Monday, the first day the S&P 500-stock index traded above 1,800, it closed at 1,791.53. That was 17 percent higher than the peak reached in the spring of 2000, when the country was in the midst of a love affair with technology stocks. Adjusted for inflation, however, it is 14 percent lower than the 2000 close.

But that may be misleading, both because of the way the S&P 500 is calculated and the nature of the bull market that ended in 2000.

The S&P, like most indexes but not like the Dow Jones industrial average, is capitalization-weighted, meaning that the companies whose stocks are worth the most have the largest impact on the movement of the index. In 2000, two market trends combined to inflate the prices of the biggest stocks.

The first was the belief that technology companies could only continue to grow and prosper. That drove up some small-company stocks, but it also did wonders for some big ones. The second was the general belief that — for the long term at least — the stock market would always be a good investment. The seemingly conservative way to invest in stocks was to buy index funds — and that meant that most of the money went into the biggest stocks, driving their prices still higher.

For the 25 companies in the S&P that were worth the most money on March 24, 2000, it is remarkable that anyone who bought five of them that day, the day the market peaked, would have lost more than 90 percent of the investment had that person held on for the next 13 years.

Those companies are Lucent Technologies, Nortel Networks, MCI WorldCom, Sun Microsystems and the American International Group. Two big technology companies then — Cisco Systems and Dell — are each still around but worth less than a third of what they were then. Dell recently went private.

Those 25 stocks, by the way, accounted for 45 percent of the value of all 500 stocks in the index. So anyone who bought an index fund put nearly half of the investment into those companies.

Calculating how stocks did is sometimes difficult. AT&T Corp., which was then the 12th-most-valuable company, is not the same company as the current AT&T Inc., which is descended from SBC Communications, then No. 18. The old AT&T shareholders have a small stake in the new AT&T, but most of the value the old shareholders would have now is in stock in Comcast, which they got when that company bought AT&T’s cable operations.

The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service