POLITICS: Don't pay ethics fine, don't get on the ballot?

Posted by ANDREW SHAIN on January 14, 2014 

— The idea of requiring S.C. candidates pay their state ethics fines before they are certified to get on the election ballot was floated at a budget hearing Tuesday.

The S.C. Ethics Commission has about $2.5 million in unpaid fines dating back to 2000, agency director Herb Hayden.

Much of the unpaid fines come from candidates who fail to win and have little incentive to pay. But about 40 percent is owed by current office holders and nothing bars them from running even if they owe the state.

"We have nothing to hold over these people," Hayden told lawmakers at a House budget subcommittee hearing.

The commission collected $189,000 in fines and filing late fees in 2012-13.

Illinois requires candidates have no state debt -- including taxes -- before allowing candidates on the ballot, ethics commission attorney Cathy Hazelwood told the subcommittee.

Lawmakers on the budget subcommittee did not say if they would make changes to an ethics-reform proposal that would help gather the unpaid cash, though State Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, D-Orangeburg, suggested perhaps garnishing their salaries or per diem payments of more recent violators.

The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service