POLITICS: Who's going to pay for the $83 million shortfall in the state health plan?

Posted by ANDREW SHAIN on January 23, 2014 

— The state health plan, which covers almost 10 percent of the South Carolina’s population, needs an extra $83 million to keep pace with the rising costs.

So who's going to pay it?

The State's Adam Beam with a little history lesson:

Two years ago, state lawmakers voted to pay for 100 percent of the increase, only to be overruled by Republican Gov. Nikki Haley and the State Budget and Control Board. But state workers and retirees sued and won.

Last year, state lawmakers again voted to pay for 100 percent of the increase. But, to soften the blow to taxpayers, they made state workers pay more to go see a doctor by increasing their co-pays.

This year, Haley — who is running for re-election — wants to increase co-pays again. But taxpayers would pay 100 percent of the premium increase, or $57 million.

“We’ve been consistent that the employee and employer should split the rising cost of employee health care,” said Christian Soura, Haley’s deputy chief of staff for budget and policy.

It's probably no surprise that lawmakers have not made up their minds yet.

“I don’t like the choices,” said state Rep. Jim Merrill, R-Berkeley, chairman of the House budget subcommittee that oversees the state health plan. “It is very difficult to balance picking up the added expense of health care when (state workers) also want pay increases.”

The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service