Farm bill passes after three years of talks

The Washington PostFebruary 4, 2014 

APTOPIX Farm Bill

Senate Agriculture Committee Chair Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., second from left, celebrates with fellow committee members during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2014, after Congress gave its final approval to a sweeping five-year farm bill. From left are, the committee's ranking member Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., Stabenow, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D.

J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE — AP

— Congress gave final approval Tuesday to a sweeping overhaul of federal farm and nutrition policies, sending a five-year farm bill to President Barack Obama for his signature.

The Senate voted 68 to 32 to approve the $956.4 billion agreement, which Obama is expected to sign in the coming days.

“As with any compromise, the Farm Bill isn’t perfect – but on the whole, it will make a positive difference not only for the rural economies that grow America’s food, but for our nation,” Obama said in a statement after the vote.

Senate Agriculture Committee chairwoman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., described the agreement as “a major bipartisan jobs bill that makes sure that 16 million people who work in agriculture ... have the support that they need.”

The 959-page bill ends billions of dollars in direct subsidy payments to the nation’s farmers. In their place, farmers can take advantage of a new crop insurance program. The agreement also saves billions by consolidating government conservation programs and cuts about $8 billion in funding for food stamps.

The bill is supposed to cut about $16 billion in spending during the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Supporters said the savings will be closer to $23 billion if automatic cuts to Agriculture Department programs that took effect last year are factored in.

Negotiations over a new bill nearly collapsed in July when House GOP leaders split the farm bill and had separate votes on measures setting most agricultural policy and another that would have slashed $40 billion in federal food stamp money by dramatically rewriting eligibility rules.

Ultimately, House and Senate negotiators agreed to cut about $8 billion – or 1 percent of the budget of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program – by closing a loophole that several states and Washington have used to boost SNAP payments to low-income households. Supporters said the cuts will come by implementing safeguards designed to reduce waste, fraud and abuse in the program.

But several organizations that advocate for the nation’s poor strongly objected to the cuts in food stamps.

The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service