Wednesday letters: Thomas should be ashamed of himself

February 19, 2014 


“The shame of Benghazi” by Cal Thomas, Jan. 22, is really the shame of Cal Thomas. He and others like him are keeping this tragedy alive for purely partisan reasons: to discredit Hillary Clinton. In the good old days, our leaders believed that foreign policy should be bipartisan; when we were in trouble overseas, it united us. Now, it divides us.

The world is a dangerous place, and being a diplomat always carries risks — especially in a country engaged in a revolution. According to the bipartisan report of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, the CIA was at fault for not notifying the U.S. military that it had an annex in Benghazi; U.S. Ambassador Stevens told the Defense Department (more than once) that he did not need increased military protection; and there was no evidence of an al-Qaida plot.

While it is true that some of our politicians have learned to say that they accept responsibility for mistakes — without any consequences (e.g., Gov. Chris Christie in New Jersey) — writers such as Cal Thomas should take responsibility for being unpatriotic when they are.

Anthony DiStefano


The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service