South Carolina’s top law enforcement officer told the governor’s Cabinet on Thursday the discussion surrounding illegal-immigration reform in the Legislature is “extremely intellectually dishonest.”
Reggie Lloyd, director of the State Law Enforcement Division, recently faced a grilling by lawmakers over why parts of the state’s 2008 anti-illegal-immigration law have not been implemented, as Lowcountry Sen. Larry Grooms began a push for new, even tougher state laws.
SLED is required under the existing law to reach an agreement with the federal government for the enforcement of immigration laws. And Grooms wants South Carolina to build on the 2008 law by modeling new legislation after Arizona to allow state and local officers to arrest people for being in the country illegally.
Lloyd said immigration enforcement costs money and depends on available federal resources. For example, he said any South Carolina officers trained for illegal immigration enforcement need to be supervised by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement, commonly known as ICE.
Never miss a local story.
Legislators have taken an “ill-conceived” and “daft” approach to the issue, Lloyd said.
“We offered to the General Assembly our resources, our experience and our expertise to try to work through these problems,” Lloyd said.
One such problem is where to put illegal immigrants who would be arrested under Grooms’ proposed law. If the state were to arrest individuals based only on their immigration status, not for committing another crime, the state would have to fund detention facilities to house the individuals, Lloyd said.
Grooms said Thursday that SLED has not done a good job communicating to lawmakers the issues the agency needs addressed to be able to enforce the 2008 law or an expansion of it.
“I think they should have spoken up before now,” Grooms said. The Legislature has passed the upcoming budget and adjourned for the year, he said. Had Lloyd or another official from SLED let the Legislature know the money problems, Grooms said he believes legislators would have found a way to see to it that funding was available.
Grooms said his proposed bill is an attempt to allow the state to go around the federal government, because of Congress’ failure to address illegal immigration issues more forcefully. “We have a serious problem in this state and it is not being addressed,” Grooms said. “We passed the toughest law in the country in 2008 and now we’re going back in, trying to pass something similar to Arizona. ... If (Lloyd) is not going to address it, he has to be held accountable by his boss and that is the governor of the state.”
Sanford said enforcing existing law is complicated. “There are certain real limitations based on funding, based on legislative mandate, based on what the feds say we can or can’t do,” Sanford said. “I think we are fully prosecuting it to the best of our ability.”