Emma’s Law: To go easy, or not, on drunk drivers to be debated at Thursday House hearing
03/19/2014 9:03 PM
03/19/2014 9:06 PM
Just how leniently to treat first-offense drunk drivers by exempting a large number of them from having to use an ignition interlock device on their cars is the topic of a Thursday morning hearing in the S.C. House of Representatives office building.
A specific issue in play will be the blood alcohol content of people who are convicted ofdrunk driving on their first offense.
As written, the bill – called Emma’s Law – would require all convicted first-offense drunk drivers blowing a .12 blood alcohol percent or higher to use a device called an ignition interlock on their vehicles. The DUI drivers would also get a special ignition interlock driver’s license so if they were caught driving another vehicle, they would be subject to extensive penalties.
However, some lawmakers want to allow more convicted drunk drivers to avoid being required to use the ignition interlock device. They will propose a standard of .15 blood alcohol percent at Thursday’s meeting.
In South Carolina, a person who blows a .08 blood alcohol percent is considered to be impaired for the purpose of driving, so the .12 standard that is being debated is already 50 percent higher than that.
Speaking in favor of the law at Thursday’s hearing will be a top official of Mothers Against Drunk Driving.
Also speaking will be David Longstreet, father of Emma Longstreet, a 6-year-old who was killed by a repeat-offender drunk driver while going to church with her family, and Columbia Fire Chief Aubrey Jenkins, whose 3-year-old grand-nephew, Josiah Jenkins, was killed earlier this month by a man now charged with felony DUI and also a repeat-offender.
The federal Centers for Disease Control says that ignition interlock devices are a proven way to keep drunks off the road and have led to substantial reductions in DUI-related fatalities. Twenty-one states have laws that require first-offense DUI offenders to use ignition interlock devices.
The bill, authored by Sen. Joel Lourie, D-Richland, is opposed by some criminal defense lawyers. Defending drunk drivers in S.C. courts and in the administrative law court system is a booming business for lawyers, who can make up to $7,500 for each routine DUI case, Emma’s Law supporters plan to remind lawmakers.
Want to Go?
When: 9 a.m. Thursday
Where: Room 516, S.C. House Blatt Office Building, State House grounds
Who: Criminal Laws Subcommittee of the Judiciary Committee
Oops, you haven't selected any newsletters. Please check the box next to one or more of our email newsletters and submit again.
Oops, you didn't provide a valid email address. Please double-check the email field and submit again.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.