Watchdog: Should Justices Toal, Pleicones recuse themselves from Harrell matter?
05/12/2014 10:57 PM
05/13/2014 9:08 AM
A watchdog citizens’ group has sent Chief Justice Jean Toal a letter asking that she and Associate Justice Costa Pleicones consider recusing themselves if they are called upon to decide civil or criminal questions involving House Speaker Bobby Harrell.
“We make this request in view of the fact that Speaker Harrell took an active role in trying to influence the votes of House members in the recent election of candidates for the office of chief justice of the Supreme Court,” wrote John Crangle, executive director of Common Cause of South Carolina.
Earlier this year, Harrell successfully campaigned to corral House votes for Toal in a bitterly fought race for a 10-year term in a chief justice election.
On Feb. 5, Toal squeaked out a victory over Pleicones, winning 95-74, and observers believe Harrell’s backing was one of the elements that allowed Toal to beat Pleicones.
If just 11 lawmakers of 170 House and Senate lawmakers had changed their votes, Toal would have lost her powerful post, in which she presides over the $60-million-a-year judicial empire of state judges, court records and a vast Internet-connected court records system.
- Related content
Judge to AG Wilson: Stop SLED and grand jury probe of House Speaker Harrell
SC watchdog group: No plan to send Harrell complaint to House panel
In South Carolina, the Legislature elects state judges and the five state Supreme Court justices.
“Both Toal and Pleicones would be perceived as having some kind of bias — either for or against Harrell,” Crangle said in his letter. “The potential bias of Toal is more obvious.”
Crangle made it clear he was not accusing either Toal or Pleicones of being prejudiced in a matter involving Harrell — merely that because of public perceptions, the justices should consider recusing themselves.
Recusals by sitting justices happen on occasion, and other judges are appointed to fill their seats.
Crangle made his request in a February letter, about a month after Attorney General Alan Wilson announced he would seek a state grand jury investigation of potential criminal ethics violations concerning Harrell.
On March 5, Supreme Court clerk Dan Sherouse wrote Crangle, acknowledging receipt of the letter and saying, “Unless and until such a matter does come before this Court or the chief justice, it would be premature for either Chief Justice Toal or Justice Pleicones to consider recusing themselves.”
Oops, you haven't selected any newsletters. Please check the box next to one or more of our email newsletters and submit again.
Oops, you didn't provide a valid email address. Please double-check the email field and submit again.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.