As an Arizona-style immigration bill moves forward, debate today is focusing on a Charleston senator’s comments about the unwillingness of Americans to do dirty work.
Sen. Robert Ford, D-Charleston argued against the bill by saying it would frighten away "Mexicans" when South Carolina needs Mexicans to perform manual labor.
Ford said neither blacks nor whites were willing to do the difficult jobs in South Carolina.
He said Mexicans would be needed to help build the Boeing plant in North Charleston.
Never miss a local story.
"I know brothers -- and I’m talking about black guys -- they are not going to do the dirty work at Boeing, to do that hauling and all that building, the dirty work," Ford said. "A brother is going to find a way to take a break."
He later made a comment about "blue-eyed brothers" also not wanting to work hard.
"Ever since this country was built, we’ve always had someone else come in and do the work for us," he said.
The bill would require S.C. police officers to check the immigration status of people they arrest, stop for a traffic violation or investigate on suspicion of breaking the law.
The S.C. Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday approved the bill. It now must be voted on by the full Senate.
Committee members discussed the bill for nearly two hours, debating its financial costs, the burden it would place on local law enforcement agencies and the fear that it would cause racial profiling toward the state’s Hispanic residents.
The committee approved the bill by a 13-6 vote, with the opposition coming from the committee’s five black members and Sen. Brad Hutto, D-Orangeburg.
If passed, the bill would require police to verify the immigration status of anyone they stop, detain or investigate by calling U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Also, it would allow jailers to transport illegal immigrants to a federal detention center after they receive permission from a judge to do so. And it requires prisons and jails to notify the U.S. Department of Homeland Security once a prisoner has completed his sentence.
The bill also would tweak South Carolina’s existing immigration law. The biggest impact would be a requirement that the S.C. Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation fine companies that have not verified the immigration status of employees. The fine would be a maximum of $1,000 per employee.
The labor department has been allowed to waive the fine because lawmakers were concerned about giving businesses time to react to the new law when it was created in 2008. However, lawmakers who support the bill said businesses have had time to implement it.
Critics of the immigration bill believe it will lead to racial profiling even though one provision specifically forbids law enforcement from stopping someone based on his or her race, ethnicity or national origin.
But those who argued against the bill said police officers who are inclined to use racial profiling tactics will continue to do so by finding trivial excuses such as busted taillights on cars to pull over Hispanics.
"From what I’m reading, we’re asking local law enforcement to do profiling on them," said Sen. John Scott, D-Richland.
That led Sen. Larry Martin, R-Pickens, to shout, "No sir. Absolutely not."
Sen. Jake Knotts, R-Lexington and a former police officer, said he had concerns about the law being applied equally across the state.
Many small police departments do not have the resources to train or equip their officers to properly check an immigration status, he said. He wanted to know how police would decide they had probable cause to ask for someone’s immigration documents.
"I’m looking at the law enforcement part of it to make sure every person is treated equally," Knotts said. "Aside from common sense, how do you decide? But you can’t pass a bill on common sense."
But Martin said local law enforcement needs to start doing its part to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in the state. Last week, a new report from the Pew Research Center estimated there were 55,000 illegal immigrants in South Carolina, a 21.4 percent decline since 2007.
Martin believes South Carolina needs a stronger immigration law because the federal government is failing to address the issue. He hopes an increase in calls from the state’s local law enforcement agencies will get the attention of federal agencies responsible for immigration enforcement.
"I want the phones of the federal government to ring off the hook," Martin said. "If it’s a burden we’re putting on local law enforcement, my apologies, but it’s something that’s got to be done."