At risk: ‘The time-tested authority of AGs to enforce law equally’
05/08/2014 7:00 AM
05/07/2014 6:19 PM
In my column today, I quoted from the statement of former attorneys general Henry McMaster, Charlie Condon and Travis Medlock about the bizarro legal theory Circuit Judge Casey Manning is considering. Here’s their full statement:
STATEMENT FROM S.C.’s THREE LIVING FORMER ATTORNEYS GENERAL
Friday May 2, 2014
The three of us listed below are attending the hearing before Judge Casey Manning today to offer our support for the time-tested authority of the Attorney General to prosecute crime and enforce the laws of South Carolina equally, with no privileges or special terms or conditions for any citizen, including elected officials.
We served consecutively as South Carolina Attorneys General for nearly 30 years, from 1983 to 2011. During his term in office, Travis Medlock successfully advocated the passage of the State Grand Jury, which is a critically important tool all subsequent attorneys general have used in the public interest to investigate allegations of public corruption and, when appropriate, to bring forward criminal indictments.
Over the past thirty years, not one of us ever imagined the Attorney General needed authorization from a legislative committee or political body in order to investigate or prosecute alleged criminal behavior by an elected official. Such a restriction would undercut the core Constitutional authority of the Attorney General. And even more importantly, it would violate the fundamental basis of our system of government that all people should be treated equally under the law.
We are here today because we believe these principles must be upheld to preserve our State’s founding ideal that no one should be above the law.
TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Attorney General 1983-1995
CHARLIE CONDON, Attorney General 1995-2003
HENRY McMASTER, Attorney General 2003-2011
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.