Thursday letters: Why punish hybrid owners?
03/13/2014 12:00 AM
03/12/2014 7:58 PM
An owner of a hybrid automobile is not paying his or her fair share for roads (“Fuel-efficient cars cut into S.C. funds for road repairs,” Feb. 5)? It’s not the owner’s fault that the state chooses to pay for roads from gasoline taxes. The hybrid driver paid more for that car so that the air quality improves for everybody. I bicycle everywhere, so I guess the state should put a meter on my vehicle to punish me for not burning gasoline on the roads
If there is not enough gasoline tax revenue to pay for roads, either the gasoline tax should go up for everybody, or the state should find money elsewhere to pay for roads. Only a person who profits from gasoline sales would punish those who use less gas.
In Arizona, unlike here, there is widespread use of residential solar power. Still, virtue there does not go unpunished. Since the homeowner with panels on his roof is not paying for infrastructure that the shortsighted, giant utility had already built, that homeowner has to pay more to the utility (70 cents per kilowatt capacity per month; the utility wanted $8 but did not get it).
This is shoot-yourself-in-the-foot logic.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The State is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.