Politics & Government

SC lawmakers’ plan to borrow money for colleges, state buildings could already be dead

Fall leaves surround the grounds of the South Carolina State House Tuesday Dec. 4, 2018, in Columbia, SC.
Fall leaves surround the grounds of the South Carolina State House Tuesday Dec. 4, 2018, in Columbia, SC. gmcintyre@thestate.com

A plan to borrow hundreds of millions of dollars to repair crumbling state-owned buildings and colleges could be on life support less than a week before the General Assembly returns to Columbia for a new two-year session.

But some leaders in the Republican-controlled Legislature say it is premature to say a potential borrowing proposal is dead.

New S.C. House budget committee chairman Murrell Smith told reporters Thursday he predicts a bond bill will not pass the Legislature in 2019. Such a proposal would come through Smith’s powerful Ways and Means Committee.

“If I had to predict, I would say no,” the Sumter Republican said. “When the governor ( Republican Henry McMaster) is opposed to a bond bill, ... I don’t know if there’s an opportunity to pass a bond bill and get a veto-proof majority to agree on that.”

Separately, a Republican senator said lawmakers shouldn’t borrow the money in a year when it has $1 billion in new money to spend. Half of that — nearly $549 million — is reserved in the state’s budget for one-time costs, such as building maintenance projects.

“Why not use one-time money now” on fixing crumbling buildings and colleges, state Sen. Greg Hembree, R-Horry, asked Thursday.

The General Assembly has not passed a bond bill in nearly two decades. Lawmakers used to pass a bond bill every few years before the election of a series of anti-borrowing governors, starting with fiscal hawk Mark Sanford in 2002.

In the meantime, without bonding, the state’s buildings have “suffered,” said S.C. House Majority Leader Gary Simrill, R-York.

Simrill said Thursday it’s too early to dismiss the idea of passing a borrowing plan. This session, he will chair the House budget committee that decides higher education spending and hears colleges’ repeated requests for more money.

“We have not used a business model since 2002 to move South Carolina forward, and we’re paying for it,” Simrill said. “We handicap ourselves if we always say, ‘No.’ ”

South Carolinians are split on whether to support a bond bill.

A 2017 Winthrop poll said 47 percent of S.C. residents would oppose a bond bill to pay for maintenance. Another 46 percent said they would favor it. Six percent were unsure, and 2 percent refused to answer the poll question.

“There is no question we need a bond bill in this state to address the educational needs in this state,” said Senate Minority Leader Nikki Setzler, D-Lexington.

This story was originally published January 3, 2019 at 12:38 PM.

Related Stories from The State in Columbia SC
Maayan Schechter
The State
Maayan Schechter (My-yahn Schek-ter) is the senior editor of The State’s politics and government team. She has covered the S.C. State House and politics for The State since 2017. She grew up in Atlanta, Ga. and graduated from the University of North Carolina-Asheville in 2013. She previously worked at the Aiken Standard and the Greenville News. She has won reporting awards in South Carolina. Support my work with a digital subscription
Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW