Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Letters to the Editor

Tightening CPO rules solves nothing, limits options for St. Helena Island landowners | Opinion

A meeting on a proposed golf and housing development drew more than 450 people to St. Helena Elementary School Thursday.
A meeting on a proposed golf and housing development drew more than 450 people to St. Helena Elementary School Thursday. kapuckett@islandpacket.com

CPO rules limiting

Note: The writer is co-founder of the Community Coalition Action Network of St. Helena Island.

Sadly, the protests of the hundreds of Gullah people herded into attending Beaufort Council Council meetings resulted in the denials of applications for a private golf course community for Pine Island.

But Pine Island developer Elvio Tropeano isn’t the only one harmed by recent decisions tightening restrictions on golf courses, etc., under the St. Helena Island Cultural Protection Overlay Zone.

Also hurt by the stricter CPO are the hundreds of silent Gullah St. Helena Island residents who must travel hundreds of miles weekly to resort jobs elsewhere. This deprived them of both stable employment closer to home, and an opportunity to finally be free of the CPO roadblocks that prevent them from trying to develop their own property.As a St. Helena Island landowner, I, too, am impacted.

Many St. Helena Gullah families have lost their valuable waterfront property due to high taxes. But some still have waterfront suited for development as restaurants, and other profitable investments yet all they can basically do with it is farm and grow trees, or lease it or sell it to others.

How can they ever create generational wealth like that? They’re tired of being poor landowners struggling to pay their taxes.

Tropeano plans to use his golf course fees to help end generational poverty on St. Helena.

His future neighbors deserve that chance.

Roy Brown, Beaufort

Negotiations needed

People are wondering why the leader of the top regional non-profit fighting to save Gullah Geechee land isn’t publicly opposing the development of the much-maligned Pine Island golf community proposed by developer Elvio Tropeano.

It’s simple: Both as a resident of St. Helena Island, and the founder/CEO of the Pan-African Family Empowerment & Land Preservation Network, I don’t see how developing the 502-acre St. Helenaville-Pine Island property threatens either Gullah culture, or Gullah land ownership.

Here’s why: Both Pine Island and St. Helenaville are former plantations.

They’ve been white-owned, private recreational retreats for more than 150 years, and their development will not cause Gullah property taxes to sky rocket across St. Helena Island.

But that’s not the truth that the public, media, and Beaufort County Council are being told. Rather, a well-organized, disinformation campaign has aroused widespread opposition to the project.

It shouldn’t take risking millions fighting lawsuits to force County Council to make a much-needed course correction that can very easily be accomplished through thoughtful mediation and negotiation that secures the best outcome for St. Helena – a low-impact golf course and residential community – instead of the 166 houses and 100 docks that Tropeano can legally develop.

Please urge your County Council member to support Pine Island negotiations.

Theresa White, Beaufort

Profiles in courage

South Carolina women should be proud of their “sister senators,” five women who filibustered a near total abortion ban and were the recent recipients of the JFK Profile in Courage Award.

I know I am proud of their efforts, although futile.

Now it’s our job to fight for the right for all women to make decisions for themselves.

Ceil Treiss, HHI

Humans not bots

With all the talk about AI and chat bots, I’d like to share the following.

I gave a newspaper subscription to a friend.

When I dialed the in-state phone number, I was transferred to an offshore call center and purchased a six-month subscription.

A year passed, and no paper was ever delivered.

I got a different excuse every time I called.

When I called my cell phone provider about some aspect of my service, I received a text urging me to go online.

My response: “No. I need to speak to a human. If you don’t want me to call, don’t put your phone number on my bill.”

When made another inquiry of a company with whom I do business, I got a canned response from their website.

Fed up with the chat bot that asked the same question over and over and seemingly understood nothing I said, nor provided enough space to allow me to explain, I’d had enough.

In an email, I told them I would not place another order unless I heard from a human being.

Amazingly, a person with a name, title and phone number responded.

Consumers still have power in the wired world.

Vasilisa Hamilton, Columbia

Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW