Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Nuclear, not natural gas, will protect environment

The V.C. Summer Nuclear Station
The V.C. Summer Nuclear Station The State

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s decision to grant an operating license to the Tennessee Valley Authority for a new nuclear reactor marks the first such decision in decades. Within the next decade two new nuclear units in Georgia and two at V.C. Summer here in South Carolina will join Watts Bar.

These third-generation plants are designed to be more cost-effective and to have even greater safety margins. Right now we need to get over the hump in building these plants so we can learn from the experience and standardize their construction to make them even more economical.

Further development, however, has been slowed by the abundance of natural gas. With no penalty for emitting pollutants and greenhouse gases, natural gas will displace nuclear and other clean, alternative energy sources. We have made a good start at dealing with air pollution and climate change in retiring coal-fired plants and building wind, solar and nuclear facilities. If we force those burning natural gas to pay the true cost, we could continue progress in protecting the environment.

Ted Besmann

Columbia

This story was originally published November 17, 2015 at 2:14 PM with the headline "Letters: Nuclear, not natural gas, will protect environment."

Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW