A federal jury is deliberating convicted Charleston church shooter Dylann Roof’s fate.
Deliberations started around 1:35 p.m., after Roof told jurors Tuesday morning they had been misled by prosecutors about his alleged deep hatred of African-Americans.
Roof, who is representing himself in the penalty phase of his hate crimes trial, gave a closing argument that lasted about five minutes. He argued that he has never said he hates African-Americans, but that “I don’t like what black people do.”
Never miss a local story.
“And anyone, including the prosecution, that thinks that I’m filled with hate has no idea what real hate is,” Roof said. “They don’t know anything about hate. They don’t know what real hatred looks like. They think they do. But they don’t, really.”
Roof went on to tell the jury that he has been told he has the right to ask them to give him a life sentence. But he said, “I’m not sure what good that would do.” He reminded the jury all he needs to get life in prison is for one person to disagree with prosecution’s request that he be sentenced to death.
That case was made by lead prosecuting attorney Jay Richardson during his closing argument, which lasted two hours, before Roof gave his. Richardson went through every horrific detail revealed during the last month of the federal hate crimes trial of Roof, a Columbia-area man.
Richardson noted Roof’s extensive planning, his continued lack of remorse and the damage he caused to the family members of the victims he killed.
“We learned about the defendant’s cold and calculated choices that caused those losses to happen,” Richardson said. “His racist ideology the acquiring of that ideology, that’s part of his preparation that’s part of what led him to walk in that door at Mother Emanuel on June 17 (2015).”
Richardson also noted how Roof spent time on racist websites, but also chose to create his own to continue spreading “his message of hate; his message of revenge; his message of agitation.”
“He spent years acquiring this deep hatred,” Richardson said. “He ‘had to do it.’ Those are the words of an extraordinary racist.”
After highlighting what the loss of every victim meant to their families, Richardson went on to enumerate reasons why Roof’s case qualifies for the death penalty. All the while, Roof, 22, sat motionless as Richardson listed the reasons why Roof should be put to death.
The jury must be unanimous in their decision for Roof to be sentenced to death. If they become deadlocked in his fate, Roof gets life in prison.
Richardson got a second chance to argue why Roof needs to be sentenced to death, during his counter argument to Roof’s closing statement.
Richardson called Roof “unrepentant” and said his closing argument highlighted how Roof’s racism is not passionate or angry, but cold and calculated.
“His response is to double down,” said Richardson in response to Roof’s closing argument. “It’s to continue to tell you the same thing. He wants you to believe that you have been misled. That indeed he was justified. That he was justified in committing a modern day lynching.
“Render the full measure of justice for this defendant,” Richardson added. “Sentence this defendant to death.”
In his closing argument, Roof also said that the jury had heard in his taped confession to the FBI that Roof felt like he “had to do it.” In court on Tuesday, Roof said “that’s obviously not true.”
“I didn’t have to do it,” Roof said. “But what I meant when I said that was that I felt that I had to do it. And I still feel that I had to do it.”
Check back for updates to this developing story.